I have to strike a balance in my life between short term and long term goals. I must work to make money but what good is it if George Bush destroys the world as we know it. I do not want to end up living in a cave, remembering the good old days when we had electricity and the Internet.
When I think about what we need for long term survival, Bush is doing the opposite on almost every issue. He is making enemies when we need more friends. He is raping the planet while we need solutions to global warming and dwindling fossil fuels. He is lying to the American people when we need an honest government that faces our problems directly and leads us in the right direction. We can't wait for him to steal the next election.
We need to Impeach George Bush now.
More information here: http://www.impeachbush.tv/
Posts
33 comments:
Okay, impeach the bastard. But who do you suggest we replace him with? Kerry? That pussy? He's the best you've got right?
Now, I'm all for getting Bush out of power, but this mentality "anybody but bush!" just doesn't fly. Sure Bush is an idiot and all, but I would rather have him over some pussy that can't make up his damn mind.
Foolish liberals. Bush will not be impeached and you cannot present one single shred of evidence to justify doing so. You will be propped up by the liberal media and possible get one looney Democrat to try drafting articles, but it will get nowhere. You ignorant liberals hate truth and fact and replace it instead with conspiracy, fanaticism, and outright lies. It is truly humorous to watch liberalism implode. Keep up the good work, watching people like you make fools of themselves is entertaining.
Isn't it interesting that those with the mentality of sgt_e, love to project the Republican stance onto the rest of us? Lies from the liberal side? That's a laugh. We are not foolish as you sgt_e, we are standing up for democracy and against a lying gov't, headed by the worst liar and criminal our country has ever had the misfortune to have represent us. You call a factual document, Downing Street Memo a lie? Because Bush simply says, "It ain't so?"
Do you really think he would come out and say, Yeah, I lied, when it would instantly give justification to impeach? You sgt_e, may continue to be a slave to this lying gov't, those of us who are strong Americans will work to protect you, your rights and democracy to be taken back from those who would control us and seek absolute power over our lives.
Isn't it interesting that those with the mentality of sgt_e, love to project the Republican stance onto the rest of us? Lies from the liberal side? That's a laugh. We are not foolish as you sgt_e, we are standing up for democracy and against a lying gov't, headed by the worst liar and criminal our country has ever had the misfortune to have represent us. You call a factual document, Downing Street Memo a lie? Because Bush simply says, "It ain't so?"
Do you really think he would come out and say, Yeah, I lied, when it would instantly give justification to impeach? You sgt_e, may continue to be a slave to this lying gov't, those of us who are strong Americans will work to protect you, your rights and democracy to be taken back from those who would control us and seek absolute power over our lives.
You guys heard of 'The Baghdad Briefing'?
local dogcatcher is better than having Bush and President Cheney
No the "Downing Street Memo" is a lie because it was obtained from a third hand source and may very well be fake. The reporter who has propagated this document now claims it is a typed copy of the original. Sure it is. You have no real evidence, only accusations and insinuation. As for me, I am not a Republican. I am not represented by the self-serving politicians in Congress. You hate Bush because he has a perspective different from your own. In your small, close-minded world you hate all who dare not to share your ideaology. Bush is not a criminal. If anyone could prove otherwise it would have been over long ago. The Democrats continue to marginalize themselves by allowing the party to be hijacked by the extreme left. The Republicans won't do the things that need to be done to make this country stronger, safer, and better, but the Dems won't either so quit your dreaming. Clinton was a failure, Carter was a failure. You have to go all the way back to Truman to find a good Democratic President. I would say Kennedy, but he was short-lived. I do think he could have been good enough to overcome his "extra curricular" activities. Anyway, the fact is there are no politicians in the two party system left that I could honestly call a leader with principle. Right now it is the Republican Party that is the lesser of two evils. That will not change until the moderate Dems win back their party and bring sanity back to the once great party.
HI, I think the times are changing, more people are getting fed up with the lies, and hopefully that will lead to more of the truth coming out.
My blog NoBu**SH**zone is pretty much dedicated to the fight for peace, truth and justice -in other words-impeaching Bush. I mostly have petition links and links to important information. THANKS!
onemillionreasons.org be sure to sign it OK?
Monday, August 29, 2005
President Bush Is Guilty!
As Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, is he not guilty of the following Articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice?
ART. 107. FALSE STATEMENTS
Any person subject to this chapter who, with intent to deceive, signs any false record, return, regulation, order, or other official document, knowing it to be false, or makes any other false official statement knowing it to be false, shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
ART. 131. PERJURY
Any person subject to this chapter who in a judicial proceeding or in a course of justice willfully and corruptly--
(1) upon a lawful oath or in a form allowed by law to be substituted for an oath, gives any false testimony material to the issue or matter of inquiry; or
(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty or perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, subscribes any false statement material to the issue or matter of inquiry;
is guilty of perjury and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct
ART. 133. CONDUCT UNBECOMING AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN
Any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman who is convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Article 134 - (Homicide, negligent)
Elements.
(1) That a certain person is dead;
(2) That this death resulted from the act or failure to act of the accused;
(3) That the killing by the accused was unlawful;
(4) That the act or failure to act of the accused which caused the death amounted to simple negligence; and
(5) That, under the circumstances, the conduct of the accused was to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.
Explanation.
(1) Nature of offense. Negligent homicide is any unlawful homicide which is the result of simple negligence. An intent to kill or injure is not required.
(2) Simple negligence. Simple negligence is the absence of due care, that is, an act or omission of a person who is under a duty to use due care which exhibits a lack of that degree of care of the safety of others which a reasonably careful person would have exercised under the same or similar circumstances. Simple negligence is a lesser degree of carelessness than culpable negligence. See paragraph 44c(2)(a).
Lesser included offenses. None
Maximum punishment. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 3 years.
Article 119—Manslaughter
Text.
“(a) Any person subject to this chapter who, with an intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm, unlawfully kills a human being in the heat of sudden passion caused by adequate provocation is guilty of voluntary manslaughter and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
(b) Any person subject to this chapter who, without an intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm, unlawfully kills a human being—
(1) by culpable negligence; or
(2) while perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate an offense, other than those named in clause (4) of section 918 of this title (article 118), directly affecting the person; is guilty of involuntary man-slaughter and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Elements.
(1) Voluntary manslaughter.
(a) That a certain named or described person is dead;
(b) That the death resulted from the act or omission of the accused;
(c) That the killing was unlawful; and
(d) That, at the time of the killing, the accused had the intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm upon the person killed.
(2) Involuntary manslaughter.
(a) That a certain named or described person is dead;
(b) That the death resulted from the act or omission of the accused;
(c) That the killing was unlawful; and
(d) That this act or omission of the accused constituted culpable negligence, or occurred while the accused was perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate an offense directly affecting the person other than burglary, sodomy, rape, robbery, or aggravated arson.
Explanation.
(1) Voluntary manslaughter.
(a) Nature of offense. An unlawful killing, although done with an intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm, is not murder but voluntary manslaughter if committed in the heat of sudden passion caused by adequate provocation. Heat of passion may result from fear or rage. A person may be provoked to such an extent that in the heat of sudden passion caused by the provocation, although not in necessary defense of life or to prevent bodily harm, a fatal blow may be struck before self-control has returned. Although adequate provocation does not excuse the homicide, it does preclude conviction of murder.
(b) Nature of provocation. The provocation must be adequate to excite uncontrollable passion in a reasonable person, and the act of killing must be committed under and because of the passion. How-ever, the provocation must not be sought or induced as an excuse for killing or doing harm. If, judged by the standard of a reasonable person, sufficient cooling time elapses between the provocation and the killing, the offense is murder, even if the accused’s passion persists. Examples of acts which may, depending on the circumstances, constitute adequate provocation are the unlawful infliction of great bodily harm, unlawful imprisonment, and the sight by one spouse of an act of adultery committed by the other spouse. Insulting or abusive words or gestures, a slight blow with the hand or fist, and trespass or other injury to property are not, standing alone, adequate provocation.
(2) Involuntary manslaughter.
(a) Culpable negligence.
(i) Nature of culpable negligence. Culpable negligence is a degree of carelessness greater than simple negligence. It is a negligent act or omission accompanied by a culpable disregard for the foresee-able consequences to others of that act or omission. Thus, the basis of a charge of involuntary manslaughter may be a negligent act or omission which, whe viewed in the light of human experience, might foreseeably result in the death of another, even though death would not necessarily be a natural and probable consequence of the act or omission. Acts which may amount to culpable negligence include negligently conducting target practice so that the bullets go in the direction of an inhabited house within range; pointing a pistol in jest at another and pulling the trigger, believing, but without taking reasonable precautions to ascertain, that it would not be dangerous; and carelessly leaving poisons or dangerous drugs where they may endanger life.
(ii) Legal duty required. When there is no legal duty to act there can be no neglect. Thus, when a stranger makes no effort to save a drowning person, or a person allows a beggar to freeze or starve to death, no crime is committed.
(b) Offense directly affecting the person. An “offense directly affecting the person” means one affecting some particular person as distinguished from an offense affecting society in general. Among offenses directly affecting the person are the various types of assault, battery, false imprisonment, voluntary engagement in an affray, and maiming.
Lesser included offenses.
(1) Voluntary manslaughter.
(a) Article 119—involuntary manslaughter
(b) Article 128—assault; assault consummated by a battery; aggravated assault
(c) Article 134—assault with intent to commit voluntary manslaughter
(d) Article 134—negligent homicide
(e) Article 80—attempts
(2) Involuntary manslaughter.
(a) Article 128—assault; assault consummated by a battery
(b) Article 134—negligent homicide
Maximum punishment.
(1) Voluntary manslaughter. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 15 years.
(2) Involuntary manslaughter. Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 10 years.
This is, in my opinion, the most embarrassing moment for America. It is one thing to go overseas an inflict your pre-emptive will on other countries but it is, and should be looked at as, criminal the way Federal government has responded to Katrina. How many lives were lost? It took our military less time to conquer a whole country than it took to get food and water to the Superdome (???). African-American baby’s, elderly and handicap was sh*t on right before our eyes on live television. I’m a 36-year-old man crying. Saddened by the effects of Katrina, but crying because my “so called” leader let hundreds maybe thousands more die. How can we say we are the greatest country in the World now without being laughed at? I am utterly ashamed to be an American this past week. Don’t get me wrong, I Love this country. But how would I survive another miscalculated, callous or moronic act by the President. I wish I could line up everyone who voted for this meathead and tell them “We Told You So”. Like others have said, "he will be judged by God on this one." You can put this on the doors of the Presidential Library (George Bush w/ a library..lol) “George Preferred Take Life Instead of Giving It.” Let the truth be his legacy.
Enough is enough! Bush's incompetance has surely made America realise that this joke of a president must resign and a inquiry put in place. If this happenned in any other country in the world they would not let their leaders get away with it.
If Iraq wasn't bad enough, now Katrina!
Get rid of the prick! As if Iraq wasn't enough, now Katrina has shown the US Gov in its truest colours!!!
IS IT NOW?
Now, will our brain washed, "right wing" friends come out of their long slumber? Or, will they continue their cold, unnatural, and unfeeling view of our world, it's inhabitants, and the tole of human suffering?
Being a skeptic, I believe that the brain-washing is too deep, to ingrained. Even now the "right-wing" pendants are shifting the blame for this national tragedy, off of our government, and on to someone or something else. The damage control has begun, and the focus, now, is shifting from the "truth " -- to the "spin".
The truth, and the facts are, (if anyone is still out there, that cares?):
FACT
1) Bush planned to go into Iraq long before 9/11. It never had anything to do with terrorism, Home-Land Security, WMD, or "Helping to bring Democracy" to the people of Iraq.
( IRAQ DEMOCRACY- A policy which is doomed to failure before it's begun - as history will teach our children, and grand-children. So, please, If we can't be honest about this fact, then let's at least get real and change the name of Iraq to "Hallabushonville").
FACT
2) When confronted recently, about the great loss of life and great suffering of our U.S. Military in Iraq - The Pres. justified this by saying that we should "continue our efforts", so that we should not "dishonor the great sacrifice of our troops". All the while, as VA benefits and medical funding is being gutted and under-funded. And, all the while calling for even more death and suffering by even more of our young men and women over-there.
(If you as a Republican, (even just a human being) can not see the inhumanity in this: Then, you are far to "gone", for any words on my part, to bring you back into the human race!)
FACT
3) Any political party in this country who has to resort to the U.S. Supreme Court, to gain The Presidency of the United States, then by virtue of that fact, you are not a President of this Country - You are, in fact, The King.
(A King does not need the consensus of the people, but a Democracy does. And, a Supreme Court, I might add, that has been stacked with daddy's appointee's, is a poor substitute for the voice of the people.)
FACT
4) Any political party that can turn the truth around, to make a war hero - (who served in the Viet Nam war ) - into a trader; and, make a coward, who failed to serve in the Viet Nam War - into a hero.
(Then, this political power is far to great a power, to serve the people; the nation; or any other ends, except to serve their own special interests). DEMOCRACY, can only work, if the people are involved. When the people are lied to, brain-washed, or usurped, then this country is not a democracy, at all.)
FACT
5) When Mexico City had it's earthquake, U.S. Aid was on the ground in less than 48 hours. Across the world, when the Tsunami hit, U.S. Aid appeared in less than 72 hours. When Hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans, 2-3 days after the flood hit, (which did most of the damage) Pres. Bush gave a speech to ask the people of the U.S. to give money to the Red-Cross! Yet, we had 5 days notice. 24 hours before it hit the Mayor called an evacuation. 3 years before it happened, FEMA and the Army Core of Engineer's were under-funded and gutted to make way for funds for Iraq. What was left, was turned over to the department of "HomeLand Security" which is also broke, under-funded and is yet to have a plan of action for such a national threat or disaster. And, again, once the flooding started, it took 5 days to get a plan, to get in, and to get help to those who were starving, in need of medical assistance, and dying.
(This was not across the world. This was not another country. This was our country, our people. Looting and street violence has been blamed for the poor response. Yet, some looting was from people that had been left to fend for themselves for 3 days or more in inhuman conditions, without aid or support. Even this weekend it has come out that when the U.S. Government finally got involved (some 5 days or more later), many people that were "saved" from "their homes" by government efforts, and were transported to a freeway underpass. These people like the ones in the Convention Center and the Dome, were again left to rot, left to die, left to fend for themselves, and ;eft tp suffer from the lack of food, water, and needed medical support.)
***********************************
Is this MY Country? Is this MY Government? Is this what we have come to? The first 3-5 days of government inaction says it all. How many have to die here? How many lives have to be lost in Iraq? How much death and destruction has to happen to our Country, to our citizens, for us to come out or our deep fog? 3 people (2 of them police officers) have killed themselves because of the horrors that the failure to address this catastrophe properly has caused.
It has been said that the people should have left...they should have just jumped into their hummers and boogied out of town. It is also said that no help could arrive until the looting stopped. (Maybe if a proper response had been made in the first place, there wouldn't have been looting or gangs - there are plenty of stories out there of people trying to help others and themselves as best as they could, when they were abandoned by our government for days at a time). Now, blamed is on the Governor. She should have asked, or "let" the National Guard in earlier. Gee, too bad she didn't know enough to say, "Mother May I ?"
There will be many excuses in the days to come. Who's respondsibility it was, who gets the blame. Just Please, Please, ... every time you hear an excuse.... JUST THINK ABOUT ALL THE REASONS (i.e. EXCUSES) WHY WE ARE IN IRAQ! Quit buying the same old "Dog and Pony Show". Stop acting like cattle, and chewing on the same old cud.
( But, never fear America, Halaburton just got the government contract to restore the U.S. Bases damaged by the current events - so, we are saved ! ,,,,,,, At long last! )
And, today they have started to drop sandbags to plug up the leaks and shortly they will start to drain the water damage, that should have and could have been forseen and prevented before the fact. And, to think that now, after almost a week has passed, we can finally start to undo all the wrongs that should have been put to right even before it happpened. Yes now, we can start to rebuild. We can start to right the wrong. We can now, just hope that in America's Future Hstory, we will never again have a President that puts his own, his business buddy's, and his friends best interest before the safety and the security of this nation and it's people.
Anyone hear a barn door close?
Fact: Gas was $1.50 a gallon before the Bush presidency.
Fact: There were no WMD's
Fact: Bush dismantled FEMA
Fact: 52% of the eligible voters voted for Bush. (WAKEUP AMERICA)
Are you better off now than you were 4 or 5 years ago??? I think not !
Impeach the VI! Get a volunteer from the Red Cross to be president, I promise you he do a hella better job!! Get someone that works for the money that is spent on the gas to go to work.
Whats worse is the legacy we now have to deal with. The new Patriot Act is more about trashing your privacy rights on the net, than anything to do with terrorism. Now everything you say on blogs such as this becomes part of your FBI file, automatically. Smile for big brother, he's watching you.
We have given up our freedom and many privacy rights in the name of security. I don't really feel more secure, do you? In fact with the VI's actions in Iraq I feel like we are going to have some serious terrorism here now. Military enviroment is what breeds terrorism.
We need a new way to elect the president so that someone from the middle class could be elected. All the presidents have big money so of course they will favor themselves at our expense. Impeach him if you think can, but look at the root of the problem istead of just the problem.
Hello, you have an interesting blog here!
I have a Tennessee insurance site. It covers Tennessee insurance related information.
Come visit if you have an interest.
-----------------------------------------------------
I would suggest we replace him with anyone who was not a member of that cult.....er.....fraternity....in yale. For him to put all of his fraternity buddies in government power positions is a conflict of interest to the American people. They will back him up no matter what he does, and that is scary and dangerous. I hope people start to wake up.
Those of us who have studied world war II (or were alive during it) are very, very alarmed over his blatant misuse of power and indifference towards the law.
Don't listen to Bush's buddies. He absolutely CAN be impeached, and he should be.
Also, if I were you, I'd delete the comments left by people that have nothing to do with the issue we are talking about.
Isn't it a good thing that the Iraqis can participate in a free election and express themselves the same way you pompass assholes do. You all talk about how you voted (more against Bush than for Kerry. Kerry is the biggest lying piece of trash in the world and I am embarassed that he is American. He's a coward and a trader). You bunch of jerks don't appreciate what you have and how you got it. Pay attention people. There is a price to pay for freedom so try to support our military. We contribute to the entire world more than anyone else. They hate us because they're jealous. If it wasn't for us the French would be speaking German right now for one. So stop being selfish with your, "I registered to vote for Kerry so the Iraqis could stay in their torture chambers and men could watch their daughters and wives being raped in front of the family before they murdered the father in front of the family ". You people are sick and selfish.
Kerry is not the best the democrats "got." Nor is this about Democrats vs. Republicans. The case against this administration should bind the two parties together. Bush's form of govt is the worse parts of both parties with none of their better qualities.
Nothing reveals how polarized this country is than the fact that republicans continue to defend Bush, when it seems clear most Republican congressman are baffled by the man.
And by the way, it is no great gift to make up your mind. Idiots make up their minds about things all the time. The position of president is not the equivalent of the iconic cowboy, where simply following your instincts and acting confident constitutes good policy (not that cowboys make policy).
Awesome post, just found your site after reading your comments on Randi's message board.
Here is another page that discusses HR635, so if you have not seen the Forum that was on CSPAN, you can watch it there.
http://www.SixThreeFive.com
Thanks and great work! I am so glad that other people know about this Resolution, so many do not.
What am I missing here?
Last week it came out that Saddams own top tier of generals were demoralized when Saddam told them there were no weapons of mass destruction. This was at a strategy meeting after the Iraq invasion.
His own top generals!
If a robber goes into a business and has his hand in his pocket and says he has a gun his ass could be toast and who would blame the robbery target?
If people would just read some history you may be surprised at how many actions the US government has taken in the past that were absolutely illegal or immoral.
Lincoln suspending habeous corpus (sp)?
FDR interning Japanese-Americans?
Setting up the Spanish for a war they didnt want so we could control Cuba, the Philipines and take over Puerto Rico?
Slaughtering American Indians?
JFK and LBJ faking Viet Nam?
The list is endless.
Vote the rascals out and let's see what the next regime does.
Wasn't it Saddam Insane the one whom put out a contract killing of Bush's father while he was visiting the Bush's buddies in Saudia Arabia shortly after the Gulf War that failed? For every action, there is a
reaction....Bruce Lee. What reaction did Clinton respond with?
And at the end of a speach by Bush and then by Cheney they said "and he (Saddam) tried to kill my/his father." A pattern of personal revenge developed and a flakey trail of reasons for attacking and capturing Saddam started to come about. Even though he had a full report on his desk about planes being used as flying missles into tall buildings from the previous administration that he paid no attention to and also discarded the facts of the 911 Report, he lied about Saddam to get him for the assassination attempt on his father. Their backup plan if the WMD's were not found, and they knew they won't up front, they would joke about it by Bush bending over and put the mass murderings by Saddam in the 80's on the reason for war table. Lies and coverups is all this administration is all about from the start to this day. He must be impeached for lying to Congress and to "We The People".
Also, did you know that Bush Sr. was a CIA (which JFK wanted to get rid of)operative during the Kennedy assassination?
Call me sometime after 8pm Atlantic Canada time and I will explain it all night if you wish 506 434 1379 I am using the evidence against the Crown up here ASAP
Dave
Barry Bachrach swears that he sent the wiretap tapes to Arlen Specter. Yet all the Senator's offices and that off Russ Feingold's in particular have denied any knowledge of the wiretap tapes for months. They want to ignore the fact that I did send them all a copy of wiretape # 139 a full six months after the DHS attempted to take me away to Cuba in April of 2003. I have many more wiretap tapes in Canada that I will use in Federal Court as evidence in an ethical effort to impeach your President byway of Canadain Courts . It would be a wonderful world someone in the USA could prove to me ASAP that they understand the meaning of the word integrity.
FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Specter:
I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
Please save the middle class for our kids. He is rich, as his family and friends, the new republican party is to eliminate the middle class, elimintate the thinkers and movers that made america. Your freedoms are going to Iraq and China and south america, Look at it this way, the anti's of the world use this tactic to prevent hunting , logging and other outdoor events, Now the republican Party, who is lead by the president, is eliminating there threat, the middle class,i.e. moving all the jobs to out sourced 3 world countries, so multi Million airs can make more millions by taking advantage of poor, hard working people. America was once this way, we have forgotten, we have let greed dominate our eyes... Now lets look into our crystal ball, See what our kids life will be, Poor, and working service jobs, or very wealthy, think of the percentage of wealthy and poor in this world, now I care, I care about gass prices, I care about comerce and jobs, Education and Health.. Bushg wants to stomp out terrisum, We then he should take care of us first, Let alternate fuel companies grow, the way to make rich bastards hurt is to take away there candy.. Supply and demand, Bush is making the the shortages in supply, and we are paying, we are paying him and his family, and we are in triple paying for the war, remember the government gets a percentage to the gas price, which goes up with the price of gas,, So think of this , I have seen young people here going to a pond shop to pon things off to get money to drive to work, as minimum wage workers they cannot afford to make it to work... Think about this, he is our leader, his decisions effect us and our kids in the future... Impeach now he is killing our future..
Impeachment?
Forget it!
Save your time and resources. Simply shoot this monster.
You spineless morons are going to get us all killed.
Why are you schmucks against fighting terrorism? Do you think it is just going to go away? WAKE UP
THE DIVIDE
WITH US, THE U.S.;
IS THE DIVIDE
WITHIN OURSELVES!
BETWEEN OUR
PRIMITIVE AND EMOTIONAL
SELVES (uninspired)
IN WHICH WE USE TOWARDS AND IN RESPONSE TO OUR FEARS AND ANXIETIES.
VERSES OUR
INTELLECTUAL AND RATIONAL
SELVES(inspired)
IN SWHICH WE USE TOWARDS AN IN RESPONSE TO OUR HOPES AND ASPIRATIONS.
the better angles, in my opinion, must prevail!
our world, (being lead by us;)
has the choice, to lead with moral authority or by thuggery.(look at our own psychologies) remember,
we have been divided here. no one is stupid here, just,not being sincere and forthright with one another.
we must stop the bully within!
we must show ourselves that there is a better world!
a liberal mind, when "mugged" by reality, would never give into the bullies army, just get back up, and find another ray of hope!
For what is the next after and also within the building of the impeachment, you are welcome to the Citizen's Constitution at http://our-constitution.wikidot.com
It is not a spam. It is serious. Please visit. You can change!
Thanks
SHOULD WE IMPEACH CLINTON, AND 77% OF CONGRESS AS WELL?
Bill Clinton’s Speech from Dec. 16th, 1988
PRESIDENT CLINTON: "Good evening.
Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.
Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.
Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.
I want to explain why I have decided, with the unanimous recommendation of my national security team, to use force in Iraq; why we have acted now; and what we aim to accomplish.
Six weeks ago, Saddam Hussein announced that he would no longer cooperate with the United Nations weapons inspectors called UNSCOM. They are highly professional experts from dozens of countries. Their job is to oversee the elimination of Iraq's capability to retain, create and use weapons of mass destruction, and to verify that Iraq does not attempt to rebuild that capability. The inspectors undertook this mission first 7 1/2 years ago at the end of the Gulf War when Iraq agreed to declare and destroy its arsenal as a condition of the ceasefire.
The international community had good reason to set this requirement. Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq..."
Source:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec98/clinton_12-16.html
Joe Brignoli
joeybrignoli@aol.com
In response to the comment about Clinton. Yes, in the 90's Saddam had WMD. But these were destroyed by the UN. That is why Clinton was so interested in working with the UN. By the time Bush took power the WMD had already been destroyed. The UN inspectors reentered Iraq and found no evidence of WMD. But Bush ignored the UN inspectors and the UN Security Council and invaded Iraq anyway. Now we have been occupying that country for 4 years. Why?
Post a Comment